References

Ai, Zhou, Zhang Yijia, Wei Hao, and Lu Mingyu. 2021. LDA-Transformer Model in Chinese Poetry Authorship Attribution.” In Information Retrieval, edited by Hongfei Lin, Min Zhang, and Liang Pang, 13026:59–73. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88189-4_5.
Algee-Hewitt, Mark. 2017. “Distributed Character: Quantitative Models of the English Stage, 1550.” New Literary History 48 (4): 751–82. https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2017.0038.
Algee-Hewitt, Mark, Sarah Allison, Marissa Gemma, Ryan Heuser, Franco Moretti, and Hannah Wasler. 2016. “Canon/Archive: Large-scale Dynamics in the Literary Field.” Pamphlets of the Stanford Literary Lab, no. 11. https://litlab.stanford.edu/LiteraryLabPamphlet11.pdf.
Algee-Hewitt, Mark, and Mark McGurl. 2015. “Between Canon and Corpus: Six Perspectives on 20th-Century Novels.” Pamphlets of the Stanford Literary Lab, no. 8. https://litlab.stanford.edu/LiteraryLabPamphlet8.pdf.
Andresen, Melanie, Markus Gärtner, Sibylle Hermann, Janina Jacke, Nora Ketschik, Felicitas Lea Kleinkopf, Jonas Kuhn, and Axel Pichler. 2022. Vorzüge von Auszügen – Urheberrechtlich geschützte Texte in den digitalen Geisteswissenschaften (nach-)nutzen.” https://doi.org/10.17175/2022_007.
Andrews, Tara, and Caroline Macé. 2012. “Trees of Texts Models and Methods for an Updated Theory of Medieval Text Stemmatology.” In Digital Humanities Conference. https://dh-abstracts.library.virginia.edu/works/1521.
Anthony, Laurence. 2022. “What Can Corpus Software Do?” In The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, edited by Anne O’Keeffe and Michael McCarthy, Second. Routledge Handbooks in Applied Linguistics. Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY: Routledge.
Antonia, Alexis, Hugh Craig, and Jack Elliott. 2014. “Language Chunking, Data Sparseness, and the Value of a Long Marker List: Explorations with Word n-Grams and Authorial Attribution.” Literary and Linguistic Computing 29 (2): 147–63. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqt028.
Archer, Jodie, and Matt Jockers. 2016. The Bestseller Code: Anatomy of the Blockbuster Novel. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Argamon, Shlomo. 2008. “Interpreting Burrows’s Delta: Geometric and Probabilistic Foundations.” Literary and Linguistic Computing 23 (2): 131–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqn003.
Artstein, Ron, and Massimo Poesio. 2008. “Inter-Coder Agreement for Computational Linguistics.” Computational Linguistics 34 (4): 555–96. https://doi.org/10.1162/coli.07-034-R2.
Ashok, Vikas Ganjigunte, Song Feng, and Yejin Choi. 2013. “Success with Style: Using Writing Style to Predict the Success of Novels.” In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 1753–64. Seattle, Washington, USA. https://aclanthology.org/D13-1181.pdf.
Baker, Paul. 2006. Glossary of Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748626908.
Barbado, Alberto, Víctor Fresno, Ángeles Manjarrés Riesco, and Salvador Ros. 2022. DISCO PAL: Diachronic Spanish Sonnet Corpus with Psychological and Affective Labels.” Language Resources and Evaluation, 1–42. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10579-021-09557-1.
Barber, Ros. 2018. “Marlowe and Overreaching: A Misuse of Stylometry.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqy040.
Barbrook, Adrian C., Christopher J. Howe, Norman Blake, and Peter Robinson. 1998. “The Phylogeny of The Canterbury Tales.” Nature 394 (6696): 839–39. https://doi.org/10.1038/29667.
Barlas, Georgios, and Efstathios Stamatatos. 2020. “Cross-Domain Authorship Attribution Using Pre-trained Language Models.” In Artificial Intelligence Applications and Innovations, edited by Ilias Maglogiannis, Lazaros Iliadis, and Elias Pimenidis, 255–66. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49161-1_22.
Barron, Alexander T. J., Jenny Huang, Rebecca L. Spang, and Simon DeDeo. 2018. “Individuals, Institutions, and Innovation in the Debates of the French Revolution.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115 (18): 4607–12. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1717729115.
Bergel, Giles, Christopher J Howe, and Heather Windram. 2015. “Lines of Succession in an English Ballad Tradition: The Publishing History and Textual Descent of The Wandering Jew’s Chronicle.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 31 (3). https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqv003.
Bernstein, Neil, Kyle Gervais, and Wei Lin. 2015. “Comparative Rates of Text Reuse in Classical Latin Hexameter Poetry.” Digital Humanities Quarterly 9 (3). http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/9/3/000237/000237.html.
Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation Across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621024.
———. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Vol. 2. London: Pearson Education Limited.
———. 2005. “Corpus-Based and Corpus-Driven Analyses of Language Variation and Use.” In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, Second. Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199677078.013.0008.
Biber, Douglas, Ulla Connor, and Thomas Upton. 2007. Discourse on the Move: Using Corpus Analysis to Describe Discourse Structure (Studies in Corpus Linguistics). Second. Vol. 28. John Benjamins Publishing Co.
Binongo, Jose Nilo G. 2003. “Who Wrote the 15th Book of Oz? An Application of Multivariate Analysis to Authorship Attribution.” Chance 16 (2): 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09332480.2003.10554843.
Bird, Steven, Ewan Klein, and Edward Loper. 2009. Natural Language Processing with Python. 1st ed. Beijing ; Cambridge [Mass.]: O’Reilly.
Blei, David. 2012. “Probabilistic Topic Models.” Communications of the ACM 55 (4): 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1145/2133806.2133826.
Blei, David, Andrew Ng, and Michael Jordan. 2003. “Latent Dirichlet Allocation.” Journal of Machine Learning Research, no. 3: 993–1022. https://doi.org/10.1145/2133806.2133826.
Bode, Katherine. 2012. Reading by Numbers: Recalibrating the Literary Field. Anthem Press. https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/25994.
———. 2020. “Why You Can’t Model Away Bias.” Modern Language Quarterly 81 (1): 95–124. https://doi.org/10.1215/00267929-7933102.
Bollmann, Marcel. 2018. “Normalization of Historical Texts with Neural Network Models.” PhD thesis, Bochum: Ruhr-Universität Bochum. https://doi.org/10.13154/294-6213.
Borgo, Mary Elizabeth. 2017. “Toward Sustainable Growth: Lessons Learned Through the Victorian Women Writers Project.” Digital Studies / Le Champ Numérique 7 (1). https://doi.org/10.16995/dscn.276.
Boudewijn, Petra. 2020. And the Award Goes to…’ Women on the Dutch Literary Award Scene.” Journal of Dutch Literature 11 (1). https://www.journalofdutchliterature.org/index.php/jdl/article/view/198.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1996. “The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 54 (1): 88. https://doi.org/10.2307/431688.
Braudel, Fernand, and Immanuel Wallerstein. 2009. “History and the Social Sciences: The Longue Durée.” Review (Fernand Braudel Center) 32 (2): 171–203. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40647704.
Broadwell, Peter M, and Timothy R Tangherlini. 2017. “Confusing the Modern Breakthrough: Naïve Bayes Classification of Authors and Works.” In DHN. https://humanit.hb.se/article/view/579.
Brunner, Annelen. 2012. “Automatic Recognition of Speech, Thought and Writing Representation in German Narrative Texts.” In Digital Humanities Conference (DH2012) Book of Abstracts. Hamburg: ADHO. https://dh-abstracts.library.virginia.edu/works/1415.
———. 2013. “Automatic Recognition of Speech, Thought, and Writing Representation in German Narrative Texts.” Literary and Linguistic Computing 28 (4): 563–75. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqt024.
Brunner, Annelen, Fotis Jannidis, Tanja Tu, and Lukas Weimer. 2020. Redewiedergabe in Heftromanen und Hochliteratur.” In Jahreskonferenz 2020 des Verbands Digital Humanities im deutschsprachigen Raum. Paderborn: DHd-Verband. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4621813.
Büchler, Marco, Philip R. Burns, Martin Müller, Emily Franzini, and Greta Franzini. 2014. “Towards a Historical Text Re-use Detection.” In Text Mining: From Ontology Learning to Automated Text Processing Applications, edited by Chris Biemann and Alexander Mehler, 221–38. Theory and Applications of Natural Language Processing. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12655-5_11.
Burnard, Lou. 2014. What Is the Text Encoding Initiative? How to Add Intelligent Markup to Digital Resources. Encyclopédie Numérique. Marseille: OpenEditionPress.
Burnard, Lou, Carolin Odebrecht, and Christof Schöch. 2021. “In Search of Comity: TEI for Distant Reading.” Journal of the Text Encoding Initiative. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3552488 (preprint).
Burrows, John. 2007. “All the Way Through: Testing for Authorship in Different Frequency Strata.” Literary and Linguistic Computing 22 (1): 27–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqi067.
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Thinking Gender. New York: Routledge.
Cafiero, Florian, and Jean-Baptiste Camps. 2019. “Why Molière Most Likely Did Write His Plays.” Science Advances 5 (11): eaax5489. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax5489.
Calvo Tello, José. 2017. “What Does Delta See Inside the Author?: Evaluating Stylometric Clusters with Literary Metadata.” In Humanidades Digitales Hispánicas. https://cligs.hypotheses.org/aktivitaeten/vortraege.
———. 2021. The Novel in the Spanish Silver Age: A Digital Analysis of Genre Using Machine Learning. Bielefeld University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839459256.
Camps, Jean-Baptiste, Thibault Clérice, and Ariane Pinche. 2020. “Stylometry for Noisy Medieval Data: Evaluating Paul Meyer’s Hagiographic Hypothesis.” arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2012.03845.
Camps, Jean-Baptiste, and Julien Randon-Furling. 2022. “Lost Manuscripts and Extinct Texts: A Dynamic Model of Cultural Transmission.” In Proceedings of the Computational Humanities Research Conference 2022, CHR 2022, Antwerp, Belgium, December 12-14, 2022, 3290:198–214. CEUR Workshop Proceedings. CEUR-WS.org. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3290/long\_paper3261.pdf.
Carvalho, Loula, and Queiroz. 2016. “Poetry in Prose: Automatic Identification of Verses in Brazilian Literature.” In Digital Humanities Conference 2016 (DH2016) Book of Abstracts. https://dh-abstracts.library.virginia.edu/works/2508.
Cavalli-Sforza, Luca L., Paolo Menozzi, and Alberto Piazza. 1994. The History and Geography of Human Genes. Text is Free of Markings edition. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.
Chang, Kent K., and Simon DeDeo. 2020. “Divergence and the Complexity of Difference in Text and Culture.” Journal of Cultural Analytics. https://doi.org/10.22148/001c.17585.
Chaudhuri, Pradim, Tathagata Dasgupta, P. Joseph Dexter, and Krithika Iyer. 2018. “A Small Set of Stylometric Features Differentiates Latin Prose and Verse.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 34 (4): 716–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqy070.
Chin, Bertha. 2018. “It’s About Who You Know: Social Capital, Hierarchies and Fandom.” In A Companion to Media Fandom and Fan Studies, edited by Paul Booth, 243–55. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119237211.ch15.
Cinkova, Silvie, and Jan Rybicki. 2020. “Stylometry in a Bilingual Setup.” In Proceedings of the Twelfth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, 977–84. Marseille, France: European Language Resources Association. https://aclanthology.org/2020.lrec-1.123.
Coffee, Neil, Jean-Pierre Koenig, Shakthi Poornima, Christopher Forstall, Roelant Ossewaarde, and Sarah Jacobson. 2012. “The Tesserae Project: Intertextual Analysis of Latin Poetry.” Literary and Linguistic Computing 28 (2). https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqs033.
Coker, Cait, and Kate Ozment. 2019. “Building the Women in Book History Bibliography, or Digital Enumerative Bibliography as Preservation of Feminist Labor.” Digital Humanities Quarterly 13 (3). http://digitalhumanities.org:8081/dhq/vol/13/3/000428/000428.html.
Coll Ardanuy, Mariona, and Caroline Sporleder. 2014. “Structure-Based Clustering of Novels.” In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Literature (CLFL), 31–39. Gothenburg, Sweden: Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/W14-0905.
Collard, Mark, Stephen J. Shennan, and Jamshid J. Tehrani. 2006. “Branching, Blending, and the Evolution of Cultural Similarities and Differences Among Human Populations.” Evolution and Human Behavior 27: 169–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.07.003.
Craig, Hugh, and Arthur F. Kinney, eds. 2009. Shakespeare, Computers, and the Mystery of Authorship. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511605437.
Craig, Hugh, and R. Whipp. 2010. “Old Spellings, New Methods: Automated Procedures for Indeterminate Linguistic Data.” Literary and Linguistic Computing 25 (1): 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqp033.
Cutting, Douglass R., David R. Karger, Jan O. Pedersen, and John W. Tukey. 2017. “Scatter/Gather: A Cluster-Based Approach to Browsing Large Document Collections.” In ACM SIGIR Forum, 51:148–59. New York, NY, USA: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3130348.3130362.
da Silva, Sara Graça, and Jamshid J. Tehrani. 2016. “Comparative Phylogenetic Analyses Uncover the Ancient Roots of Indo-European Folktales.” Royal Society Open Science 3 (1): 150645. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150645.
Dash, Niladri Sekhar. 2021. Language Corpora Annotation and Processing. Singapore: Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2960-0.
De la Fuente, Eduardo. 2007. “The New Sociology of Art: Putting Art Back into Social Science Approaches to the Arts.” Cultural Sociology 1 (3): 409–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975507084601.
de Paepe, Timothy. 2014. “Visualizing Theatrical Heritage: Computer Modelling as a Tool for Researching the Theatre History of the Low Countries.” In Digital Humanities Conference 2014: Book of Abstracts. Lausanne: ADHO. https://dh-abstracts.library.virginia.edu/works/2146.
Dekel, Yael, and Itay Marienberg-Milikowsky. 2021. “From Distant to Public Reading The (Hebrew) Novel in the Eyes of Many: The (Hebrew) Novel in the Eyes of Many.” Magazén, no. 2 (December): JournalArticle_5053. https://doi.org/10.30687/mag/2724-3923/2021/04/003.
Do Dinh, Erik-Lân, Hannah Wieland, and Iryna Gurevych. 2018. “Weeding Out Conventionalized Metaphors: A Corpus of Novel Metaphor Annotations.” In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 1412–24. Brussels, Belgium: Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D18-1171.
Du, Keli, Julia Dudar, Cora Rok, and Christof Schöch. 2021. “Zeta & Eta: An Exploration and Evaluation of Two Dispersion-based Measures of Distinctiveness.” Proceedings Computational Humanities Research 2021 1613: 0073. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2989/.
Du, Keli, Julia Dudar, and Christof Schöch. 2022. “Evaluation of Measures of Distinctiveness: Classification of Literary Texts on the Basis of Distinctive Words.” https://doi.org/10.48694/JCLS.102.
Durham, William H. 1990. “Advances in Evolutionary Culture Theory.” Annual Review of Anthropology 19 (1): 187–210. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.001155.
Eder, Maciej. 2011. “Style-Markers in Authorship Attribution : A Cross-Language Study of the Authorial Fingerprint.” Studies in Polish Linguistics 6 (1). https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/68325.
———. 2012. “Mind Your Corpus: Systematic Errors in Authorship Attribution.” In Digital Humanities Conference, 28:4. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqt039.
———. 2013a. “Bootstrapping Delta: A Safety Net in Open-Set Authorship Attribution.” In Digital Humanities Conference. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Bootstrapping-Delta%3A-a-safety-net-in-open-set-Eder/8fc37de7e6a7cf200d65a12506b5ebf0bda77c4d.
———. 2013b. “Does Size Matter? Authorship Attribution, Small Samples, Big Problem.” Literary and Linguistic Computing 30 (1): 167–82. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqt066.
———. 2013c. “Mind Your Corpus: Systematic Errors in Authorship Attribution.” Literary and Linguistic Computing 28 (4): 603–14. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqt039.
———. 2015. “Taking Stylometry to the Limits: Benchmark Study on 5,281 Texts from Patrologia Latina.” In Digital Humanities Conference. Sydney. https://dh-abstracts.library.virginia.edu/works/2364.
———. 2017. “Short Samples in Authorship Attribution: A New Approach.” In Digital Humanities Conference 2017: Book of Abstracts. https://dh2017.adho.org/abstracts/341/341.pdf.
Eder, Maciej, and Rafał L. Górski. 2023. “Stylistic Fingerprints, POS-tags, and Inflected Languages: A Case Study in Polish.” Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 30 (1): 86–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/09296174.2022.2122751.
Eder, Maciej, Jan Rybicki, and Mike Kestemont. 2016. “Stylometry with R: A Package for Computational Text Analysis.” The R Journal 8 (1): 107. https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2016-007.
Ellegård, Alvar. 1962. A Statistical Method for Determining Authorship: The Junius Letters, 1769-1772. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg.
Ellis, Paul D. 2010. The Essential Guide to Effect Sizes: Statistical Power, Meta-Analysis, and the Interpretation of Research Results. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511761676.
English, James F. 2008. The Economy of Prestige: Prizes, Awards, and the Circulation of Cultural Value. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.
Erlin, Matt. 2017. “Topic Modeling, Epistemology, and the English and German Novel.” Journal of Cultural Analytics. https://doi.org/ttps://doi.org/10.22148/16.014.
Evert, St. 2009. “Corpora and Collocations.” In An International Handbook, 2:1212–48. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110213881.2.1212.
———. 2022. “Corpus Encoding and Management Manual CWB Version 3.5.” https://cwb.sourceforge.io/files/CWB_Encoding_Tutorial.pdf.
Evert, Stefan. 2008. “Inside the IMS Corpus Workbench.” Presentation at the {{IULA}}. Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain. https://cwb.sourceforge.io/files/Evert2008_InsideCWB.pdf.
Evert, Stefan, and Andrew Hardie. 2011. “Twenty-First Century Corpus Workbench: Updating a Query Architecture for the New Millennium.” In Corpus Linguistics 2011. GBR: University of Birmingham. https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/62721/.
Evert, St., Thomas Proisl, Fotis Jannidis, Isabella Reger, Steffen Pielström, Christof Schöch, and Thorsten Vitt. 2017. “Understanding and Explaining Delta Measures for Authorship Attribution.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 32 (suppl_2). https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqx023.
Falk, Michael Gregory. 2015. “Modelling Genre Using Character Networks: The National Tales and Domestic Novels of Maria Edgeworth.” In Digital Humanities 2015: Book of Abstracts. Sydney: ADHO. https://dh-abstracts.library.virginia.edu/works/2308.
Feldman, Ronen, and James Sanger. 2006. The Text Mining Handbook: Advanced Approaches in Analyzing Unstructured Data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Feng, Wei Vanessa, and Graeme Hirst. 2013. “Patterns of Local Discourse Coherence as a Feature for Authorship Attribution.” Literary and Linguistic Computing 29 (2): 191–98. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqt021.
Fièvre, Paul, ed. 2007. Théâtre classique. Paris: Université Paris IV-Sorbonne. https://theatre-classique.fr/.
Fischer, Frank, Ingo Börner, Mathias Göbel, Angelika Hechtl, Christoph Kittel, Carsten Milling, and Peer Trilcke. 2019. Programmable Corpora Die digitale Literaturwissenschaft zwischen Forschung und Infrastruktur am Beispiel von DraCor.” In Jahreskonferenz 2019 des Verbands Digital Humanities im deutschsprachigen Raum. Mainz und Frankfurt: DHd-Verband. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4622061.
Fleiss, Joseph L. 1971. “Measuring Nominal Scale Agreement Among Many Raters.” Psychological Bulletin 76 (5): 378–82. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031619.
Forlini, Stefania, Uta Hinrichs, and Bridget Moynihan. 2016. “The Stuff of Science Fiction: An Experiment in Literary History.” Digital Humanities Quarterly 10 (1). http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/10/1/000228/000228.html.
Forsyth, Richard, and David Holmes. 2018. “The Writeprints of Man: A Stylometric Study of Lafayette’s Hand in Paine’s ’Rights of Man’.” Digital Humanities Quarterly 12 (1). http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/12/1/000371/000371.html.
Francis, W. N., and H. Kucera. 1979. “Brown Corpus Manual.” Providence: Brown University. http://korpus.uib.no/icame/brown/bcm.html.
Francisco, Virginia, Raquel Hervás, Federico Peinado, and Pablo Gervás. 2012. EmoTales: Creating a Corpus of Folk Tales with Emotional Annotations.” Language Resources and Evaluation 46. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10579-011-9140-5.
Franzini, Greta, Mike Kestemont, Gabriela Rotari, Melina Jander, Jeremi K. Ochab, Emily Franzini, Joanna Byszuk, and Jan Rybicki. 2018. “Attributing Authorship in the Noisy Digitized Correspondence of Jacob and Wilhelm Grimm.” Frontiers in Digital Humanities 5. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fdigh.2018.00004.
Gabrielatos, Costas. 2018. “Keyness Analysis: Nature, Metrics and Techniques.” In Corpus Approaches to Discourse, edited by Charlotte Taylor and Anna Marchi, 1st Edition, 225–58. Routledge. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/227092349.pdf.
Garside, Roger, and Paul Rayson. 1987. “The CLAWS Word-Tagging System.” The Computational Analysis of English: A Corpus-Based Approach, 30–41. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/2618590_The_CLAWS_Web_Tagger/citations.
Gasparov, Mikhail. 1996. A History of European Versification. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
Gavin, Michael. 2014. “Agent-Based Modeling and Historical Simulation.” Digital Humanities Quarterly 008 (4).
———. 2023. Literary Mathematics: Quantitative Theory for Textual Studies. Stanford Text Technologies. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
Gawley, James O, and A Caitlin Diddams. 2017. “Comparing the Intertextuality of Multiple Authors Using Tesserae: A New Technique for Normalization.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 32 (suppl_2): ii53–59. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqx038.
Gehrke, Stefanie. 2016. “Biblissima - Following Medieval Manuscripts and Incunabula Through Their Existence via a Semantic Web Application.” In Digital Humanities 2016: Book of Abstracts. Krakow: ADHO. https://dh-abstracts.library.virginia.edu/works/2691.
Gemma, Marissa, Frédéric Glorieux, and Jean-Gabriel Frédéric. 2015. “Operationalizing the Colloquial Style: Repetition in 19th-Century American Fiction.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 32 (2). https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqv066.
Geyken, Alexander, and Thomas Gloning. 2015. “A Living Text Archive of 15th-19th-Century German. Corpus Strategies, Technology, Organization.” In Historical Corpora: Challenges and Perspectives, edited by Jost Gippert and Ralf Gehrke. Narr Francke Attempto Verlag.
Gladwin, Alexander A., Matthew J. Lavin, and Daniel M. Look. 2015. “Stylometry and Collaborative Authorship: Eddy, Lovecraft, and The Loved Dead.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 32 (1): 123–40. abc_10.
Gómez-Adorno, Helena, Juan-Pablo Posadas-Duran, Germán Ríos-Toledo, Grigori Sidorov, Gerardo Sierra, Helena Gómez-Adorno, Juan-Pablo Posadas-Duran, Germán Ríos-Toledo, Grigori Sidorov, and Gerardo Sierra. 2018. “Stylometry-Based Approach for Detecting Writing Style Changes in Literary Texts.” Computación y Sistemas 22 (1): 47–53. https://doi.org/10.13053/cys-22-1-2882.
Gramsci, Antonio. 1991. Selections from Cultural Writings. Edited by David Anthony Forgacs. 1. paperback ed. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.
Grayston, K., and G. Herdan. 1959. “The Authorship of the Pastorals in the Light of Statistical Linguistics.” New Testament Studies 6 (1): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0028688500001284.
Grefenstette, Gregory. 1999. “Tokenization.” In Syntactic Wordclass Tagging, edited by Nancy Ide, Jean Véronis, and Hans van Halteren, 9:117–33. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9273-4_9.
Gries, Stefan Th. 2008. “Dispersions and Adjusted Frequencies in Corpora.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 13 (4): 403–37. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.13.4.02gri.
———. 2010. “Useful Statistics for Corpus Linguistics.” A Mosaic of Corpus Linguistics: Selected Approaches 66: 269–91. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Stefan-Gries-2/publication/267242111_Useful_statistics_for_corpus_linguistics/links/5466341a0cf2f5eb180168f4/Useful-statistics-for-corpus-linguistics.pdf.
———. 2021. “Analyzing Dispersion.” In A Practical Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, edited by Magali Paquot and Stefan Th. Gries, 99–118. Berlin & New York: Springer. https://stgries.info/research/2020_STG_Dispersion_PHCL.pdf.
Grieve, Jack. 2007. “Quantitative Authorship Attribution: An Evaluation of Techniques.” Literary and Linguistic Computing 22 (3): 251–70. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqm020.
———. 2023. “Register Variation Explains Stylometric Authorship Analysis.” Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 19 (1): 47–77. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2022-0040.
Grieve, Jack, Isobelle Clarke, Emily Chiang, Hannah Gideon, Annina Heini, Andrea Nini, and Emily Waibel. 2019. “Attributing the Bixby Letter Using n-Gram Tracing.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 34 (3): 493–512. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqy042.
Grzybek, Peter. 2014. “The Emergence of Stylometry: Prolegomena to the History of Term and Concept.” Text Within Text - Culture Within Culture, 58–75. http://www.peter-grzybek.eu/science/publications/2014/grzybek_2014_stylometry.pdf.
Guillory, John. 1993. Cultural Capital: The Problem of Literary Canon Formation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hadjadj, Hassina, and Halim Sayoud. 2021. Arabic Authorship Attribution Using Synthetic Minority Over-Sampling Technique and Principal Components Analysis for Imbalanced Documents: International Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence 15 (4): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCINI.20211001.oa33.
Halvani, Oren, Christian Winter, and Lukas Graner. 2019. “Assessing the Applicability of Authorship Verification Methods.” arXiv:1906.10551 [Cs, Stat], June. https://doi.org/10.1145/3339252.3340508.
Hammond, Michael. 2013. “Calculating Syllable Count Automatically from Fixed-Meter Poetry in English and Welsh *.” Literary and Linguistic Computing 29 (2): 218–33. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqt019.
Han, Jiawei, and Micheline Kamber. 2012. Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques. Third. Burlington, MA: Elsevier. http://myweb.sabanciuniv.edu/rdehkharghani/files/2016/02/The-Morgan-Kaufmann-Series-in-Data-Management-Systems-Jiawei-Han-Micheline-Kamber-Jian-Pei-Data-Mining.-Concepts-and-Techniques-3rd-Edition-Morgan-Kaufmann-2011.pdf.
Harris, Wendell V. 1991. “Canonicity.” PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 106 (1): 110–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/462827.
Hearst, M.arti A., and Jan O. Pedersen. 1996. “Reexamining the Cluster Hypothesis: Scatter/Gather on Retrieval Results.” In Proceedings of the 19th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 76–84. https://doi.org/10.1145/243199.243216.
Heiden, Serge, and Alexei Lavrentiev. 2013. TXM Platform for Analysis of TEI Encoded Textual Sources.” In Digital Humanities 2013: Book of Abstracts. Lincoln: ADHO. https://dh-abstracts.library.cmu.edu/works/1713.
Hempfer, Klaus W. 1973. Gattungstheorie: Information und Synthese. München: Fink.
———. 2014. “Some Aspects of a Theory of Genre.” In Linguistics and Literary Studies / Linguistik Und Literaturwissenschaft, edited by Monika Fludernik and Daniel Jacob. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110347500.405.
Henny-Krahmer, Ulrike. 2017. Bib-ACMé Bibliografía digital de novelas argentinas, cubanas y mexicanas (1830-1910).” In Humanidades Digitales Hispánicas (HDH2017): Sociedades, políticas, saberes. Málaga: HDH. https://hennyu.github.io/hdh_17/index.html#/.
———. 2023. Genre Analysis and Corpus Design. Nineteenth-Century Spanish-American Novels (1830-1910). SIDE 17. Berlin: IDE. https://side17.i-d-e.de/.
Hernández-Lorenzo, Laura, and Joanna Byszuk. 2022. “Challenging Stylometry: The Authorship of the Baroque Play La Segunda Celestina.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, November, fqac063. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqac063.
Herrmann, J. Berenike, Arthur M. Jacobs, and Andrew Piper. 2021. “Computational Stylistics.” In Handbook of Empirical Literary Studies, edited by Donald Kuiken and Arthur M. Jacobs, 451–86. De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110645958-018.
Herrmann, J. Berenike, and Thomas Messerli. 2020“... Hungere Schon Nach Dem Nächsten Band. Eine Untersuchung von Metaphern Für Leseerfahrungen in Web 2.0 Literaturrezensionen.” https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4621976.
Herrmann, J. Berenike, and Thomas C. Messerli. 2019. “Metaphors We Read by: Finding Metaphorical Conceptualizations of Reading in Web 2.0 Book Reviews.” In Digital Humanities 2020: Book of Abstracts. ADHO. https://hcommons.org/deposits/item/hc:31569/.
Hettinger, Lena, Martin Becker, Isabella Reger, Fotis Jannidis, and Andreas Hotho. 2015. “Genre Classification on German Novels.” In 2015 26th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA), 249–53. Valencia, Spain: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/DEXA.2015.62.
Hettinger, Lena, Fotis Jannidis, Isabella Reger, and Andreas Hotho. 2016. “Significance Testing for the Classification of Literary Subgenres.” In Digital Humanities 2016 Book of Abstracts. Krakow: ADHO. https://dh-abstracts.library.virginia.edu/works/2630.
Heuser, Ryan, and Long Le-Khac. 2012. “A Quantitative Literary History of 2,958 Nineteenth-Century British Novels: The Semantic Cohort Method.” Standford Literary Lab Pamphlet, no. 4. https://litlab.stanford.edu/LiteraryLabPamphlet4.pdf.
Hoover, David L. 2015. “Rare N-Grams, Victorian Drama, and Authorship Attribution.” In Digital Humanities Conference 2015 Book of Abstracts. Sydney: ADHO. https://dh-abstracts.library.virginia.edu/works/2340.
———. 2018. “Authorship Attribution Variables and Victorian Drama: Words, Word-Ngrams, and Character-Ngrams.” In Digital Humanities Conference 2018 Book of Abstracts. Mexiko City: ADHO. https://dh-abstracts.library.virginia.edu/works/6293.
Hoover, David L. 2007. “Corpus Stylistics, Stylometry, and the Styles of Henry James.” Style 41 (2): 174–203. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5325/style.41.2.174.
Houvardas, John, and Efstathios Stamatatos. 2006. “N-Gram Feature Selection for Authorship Identification.” In Artificial Intelligence: Methodology, Systems, and Applications, edited by Jérôme Euzenat and John Domingue, 4183:77–86. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11861461_10.
Huber, Eva, and Çağrı Çöltekin. 2020. “Reproduction and Replication: A Case Study with Automatic Essay Scoring.” In Proceedings of the 12th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, 5603–13. Marseille, France: European Language Resources Association. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/2020.lrec-1.688.
Hughes, James M., Nicholas J. Foti, David C. Krakauer, and Daniel N. Rockmore. 2012. “Quantitative Patterns of Stylistic Influence in the Evolution of Literature.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 (20): 7682–86. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1115407109.
Ide, Nancy, and Keith Suderman. 2014. “The Linguistic Annotation Framework: A Standard for Annotation Interchange and Merging.” Language Resources and Evaluation 48 (3): 395–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-014-9268-1.
Iwata, Yoshimi. 2012. “Tracing the History of Noh Texts by Mathematical Methods Validitating the Application of Phylogenetic Methods to Noh Texts.” In Digital Humanities Conference. https://researchr.org/publication/dihu-2012.
Jackson, MacDonald P. 2010. “Parallels and Poetry: Shakespeare, Kyd, and "Arden of Faversham.” Medieval & Renaissance Drama in England 23: 17–33. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24322553.
Jacobs, Arthur M., and Annette Kinder. 2020. “Quasi Error-free Text Classification and Authorship Recognition in a Large Corpus of English Literature Based on a Novel Feature Set.” arXiv:2010.10801 [Cs], October. http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.10801.
Jakubíček, Miloš, Adam Kilgarriff, Diana McCarthy, and Pavel Rychlý. 2010. “Fast Syntactic Searching in Very Large Corpora for Many Languages.” In Proceedings of the 24th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, 741–47. Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan: Institute of Digital Enhancement of Cognitive Processing, Waseda University. https://aclanthology.org/Y10-1086.
Janicki, Maciej, Kati Kallio, and Mari Sarv. 2022. “Exploring Finnic Written Oral Folk Poetry Through String Similarity.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, July, fqac034. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqac034.
Jannidis, Fotis, Leonard Konle, and Peter Leinen. 2019. Makroanalytische Untersuchung von Heftromanen.” In Digital Humanities im deutschsprachigen Raum. https://zenodo.org/record/4622094/files/181_final-KONLE_Leonard_Makroanalytische_Untersuchung_von_Heftromanen.pdf.
Jannidis, Fotis, Leonard Konle, Albin Zehe, Andreas Hotho, and Markus Krug. 2018. “Analysing Direct Speech in German Novels.” In Jahreskonferenz Des DHd-Verbands 2018: Book of Abstracts. Köln: DHd-Verband. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4622454.
Jannidis, Fotis, and Gerhard Lauer. 2014. “Burrows’s Delta and Its Use in German Literary History.” In Distant Readings. Topologies of German Culture in the Long Nineteenth Century, edited by Matt Erlin and Lynne Tatlock, 29–54. Rochester: Camden House. gerhardlauer.de/index.php/download_file/view/335/1/.
Jannidis, Fotis, Isabella Reger, Albin Zehe, Martin Becker, Lena Hettinger, and Andreas Hotho. 2017. “Analyzing Features for the Detection of Happy Endings in German Novels.” In Jahreskonferenz 2017 Des Verbands Digital Humanities Im Deutschsprachigen Raum. Bern: DHd-Verband. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4622782.
Jockers, Matt. 2013. Macroanalysis: Digital Methods and Literary History. University of Illinois Press.
Jockers, Matt, and Gabi Kirilloff. 2017. “Understanding Gender and Character Agency in the 19th Century Novel.” Journal of Cultural Analytics. https://culturalanalytics.org/article/11066-understanding-gender-and-character-agency-in-the-19th-century-novel.
Jockers, Matt, and Daniela Witten. 2010. “A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Methods for Authorship Attribution.” Literary and Linguistic Computing 25 (2): 215–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqq001.
Jungmannová, Lenka, and Petr Plecháč. 2022. “Unsigned Play by Milan Kundera? An Authorship Attribution Study.” https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2212.09879.
Juola, Patrick. 2003. “The Time Course of Language Change.” Computers and the Humanities 37 (1): 77–96. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021839220474.
———. 2015. “The Rowling Case: A Proposed Standard Analytic Protocol for Authorship Questions.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 30 (suppl_1): i100–113. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqv040.
Jurafsky, Daniel, and James.H. Martin. 2023. Speech and Language Processing. Draft (3d edition). https://web.stanford.edu/~jurafsky/slp3/.
Jurish, Bryan. 2010. “Comparing Canonicalizations of Historical German Text.” In Proceedings of the 11th Meeting of the ACL Special Interest Group on Computational Morphology and Phonology, 72–77. Uppsala, Sweden: Association for Computational Linguistics. https://aclanthology.org/W10-2209.
Kao, Justine, and Dan Jurafsky. 2012. “A Computational Analysis of Style, Affect, and Imagery in Contemporary Poetry.” In Proceedings of the NAACL-HLT 2012 Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Literature, 8–17. Montréal, Canada: Association for Computational Linguistics. https://aclanthology.org/W12-2502.
Kessler, Brett, Geoffrey Nunberg, and Hinrich Schutze. 1997. “Automatic Detection of Text Genre.” In 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 8th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 32–38. Madrid: ACL. https://doi.org/10.3115/976909.979622.
Kestemont, Mike. 2012. “Evaluating Unmasking for Cross-Genre Authorship Verification.” In Digital Humanities 2012: Book of Abstracts. Hamburg: ADHO. https://dh-abstracts.library.virginia.edu/works/1452.
Kestemont, Mike, and Folgert Karsdorp. 2020. “Estimating the Loss of Medieval Literature with anUnseen Species Model from Ecodiversity.” Computational Humanities Research. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2723/short10.pdf.
Kestemont, Mike, Sara Moens, and Jeroen Deploige. 2013. “Collaborative Authorship in the Twelfth Century: A Stylometric Study of Hildegard of Bingen and Guibert of Gembloux.” Literary and Linguistic Computing 30 (2): 199–224. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqt063.
Kestemont, Mike, Justin Stover, Moshe Koppel, Folgert Karsdorp, and Walter Daelemans. 2016a. “Authenticating the Writings of Julius Caesar.” Expert Systems with Applications 63: 86–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.06.029.
———. 2016b. “Authorship Verification with the Ruzicka Metric.” In Digital Humanities Conference 2016 (DH2016) Book of Abstracts. Krakow: ADHO. https://dh-abstracts.library.virginia.edu/works/2542.
Kestemont, Mike, Els Stronks, Martine de Bruin, and Tim de Winkel. 2017. Van Wie Is Het Wilhelmus? De Auteur van Het Nederlandse Volkslied Met de Computer Onderzocht. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Kilgarriff, Adam, Vít Baisa, Jan Bušta, Miloš Jakubíček, Vojtěch Kovář, Jan Michelfeit, Pavel Rychlý, and Vít Suchomel. 2014. “The Sketch Engine: Ten Years On.” Lexicography 1 (1): 7–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40607-014-0009-9.
Kim, Evgeny, Sebastian Pado, and Roman Klinger. 2017. “Prototypical Emotion Developments in Adventures, Romances, and Mystery Stories.” In Digital Humanities 2017: Book of Abstracts. Montréal: ADHO. https://dh-abstracts.library.virginia.edu/works/3891.
Kocher, Mirco, and Jacques Savoy. 2018. “Evaluation of Text Representation Schemes and Distance Measures for Authorship Linking.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 34 (1): 189–207. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqy013.
Koolen, Corina. 2018. “Reading Beyond the Female: The Relationship Between Perception of Author Gender and Literary Quality.” PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam.
Koolen, Corina, Karina van Dalen-Oskam, Andreas van Cranenburgh, and Erica Nagelhout. 2020. “Literary Quality in the Eye of the Dutch Reader: The National Reader Survey.” Poetics 79 (April): 101439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2020.101439.
Koppel, Moshe, and Jonathan Schler. 2004. “Authorship Verification as a One-Class Classification Problem.” In Twenty-First International Conference on Machine Learning - ICML ’04, 62. Banff, Alberta, Canada: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/1015330.1015448.
Koppel, Moshe, Jonathan Schler, and Shlomo Argamon. 2009. “Computational Methods in Authorship Attribution.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60 (1): 9–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20961.
Koppel, Moshe, and Yaron Winter. 2014. “Determining If Two Documents Are Written by the Same Author: Determining If Two Documents Are Written by the Same Author.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 65 (1): 178–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22954.
Krautter, Benjamin. 2020. Ein Schritt zurück: Distinktive Eigenschaften im deutschsprachigen Drama.” In DHd 2020 Spielräume: Digital Humanities zwischen Modellierung und Interpretation. 7. Tagung des Verbands "Digital Humanities im deutschsprachigen Raum. Paderborn: DHd-Verband. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4621893.
Kytö, Merja. 2011. “Corpora and Historical Linguistics.” Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada 11 (2): 417–57. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-63982011000200007.
Labbé, Cyril, and Dominique Labbé. 2001. “Inter-Textual Distance and Authorship Attribution Corneille and Molière.” Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 8 (3): 213–31. https://doi.org/10.1076/jqul.8.3.213.4100.
Labbé, Dominique. 2007. “Experiments on Authorship Attribution by Intertextual Distance in English*.” Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 14 (1): 33–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/09296170600850601.
Lassche, Alie, Jan Kostkan, and Kristoffer Nielbo. 2022. “Chronicling Crises: Event Detection in Early Modern Chronicles from the Low Countries.” In Proceedings of the Computational Humanities Research Conference 2022, 215–30. Antwerp: CEUR Workshop Proceedings. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3290/short_paper4697.pdf.
Le Goff, Jacques. 2015. Must We Divide History into Periods? Translated by M. B. DeBevoise. European Perspectives. New York Chichester: Columbia University Press.
Leech, Geoffrey. 1993. “Corpus Annotation Schemes.” Literary and Linguistic Computing 8 (4): 275–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/8.4.275.
Levison, M., A. Q. Morton, and W. C. Wake. 1966. “On Certain Statistical Features of the Pauline Epistles.” The Philosophical Journal 3: 129–48.
Lijffijt, Jefrey, Terttu Nevalainen, Tanja Säily, Panagiotis Papapetrou, Kai Puolamäki, and Heikki Mannila. 2014. “Significance Testing of Word Frequencies in Corpora.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 31 (2): 374–97. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqu064.
Long, Hoyt J. 2021. The Values in Numbers: Reading Japanese Literature in a Global Information Age. New York: Columbia University Press.
López-Escobedo, Fernanda, Carlos-Francisco Méndez-Cruz, Gerardo Sierra, and Julián Solórzano-Soto. 2013. “Analysis of Stylometric Variables in Long and Short Texts.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 95 (October): 604–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.688.
Manjavacas, Enrique, Folgert Karsdorp, and Mike Kestemont. 2020. “A Statistical Foray into Contextual Aspects of Intertextuality.” Computational Humanities Research. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2723/long28.pdf.
Manjavacas, Enrique, Brian Long, and Mike Kestemont. 2019. “On the Feasibility of Automated Detection of Allusive Text Reuse.” In Proceedings of the 3rd Joint SIGHUM Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Cultural Heritage, Social Sciences, Humanities and Literature, 104–14. Minneapolis, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W19-2514.
Mann, Joshua L. 2018. “How Technology Means: Texts, History, and Their Associated Technologies.” Digital Humanities Quarterly 12 (3). http://digitalhumanities.org:8081/dhq/vol/12/3/000398/000398.html.
Mathet, Yann, Antoine Widlöcher, and Jean-Philippe Métivier. 2015. “The Unified and Holistic Method Gamma (γ) for Inter-Annotator Agreement Measure and Alignment.” Computational Linguistics 41 (3): 437–79. https://doi.org/10.1162/COLI_a_00227.
Mazurko, Anton, and Tomasz Walkowiak. 2020. “Computer Based Stylometric Analysis of Texts in Ukrainian Language.” In Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing, edited by Leszek Rutkowski, Rafał Scherer, Marcin Korytkowski, Witold Pedrycz, Ryszard Tadeusiewicz, and Jacek M. Zurada, 12416:220–30. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61534-5_20.
McEnery, Tony, and Andrew Hardie. 2012. Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press.
Meyer, Christine. 2021. Questioning the Canon: Counter-Discourse and the Minority Perspective in Contemporary German Literature. De Gruyter. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110674392/html.
Moisl, Hermann. 2011. “Finding the Minimum Document Length for Reliable Clustering of Multi-Document Natural Language Corpora.” Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 18 (1): 23–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/09296174.2011.533588.
Moravec, Michelle, and Kent K. Chang. 2021. “Feminist Bestsellers: A Digital History of 1970s Feminism.” Journal of Cultural Analytics 6 (2). https://doi.org/10.22148/001c.22333.
Moretti, Franco. 2000. “The Slaughterhouse of Literature.” Modern Language Quarterly 61 (1): 207–28. https://doi.org/10.1215/00267929-61-1-207.
———. 2005. Graphs, Maps, Trees: Abstract Models for a Literary History. Verso.
Moretti, Franco, and Oleg Sobchuk. 2019. “Hidden In Plain Sight.” New Left Review, no. 118 (August): 86–115. https://newleftreview.org/issues/ii118/articles/franco-moretti-oleg-sobchuk-hidden-in-plain-sight.
Mosteller, Frederick, and David L. Wallace. 1963. “Inference in an Authorship Problem.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 58 (302): 275–309. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2283270.
Mukherjee, Ankhi. 2017. “Canonicity.” Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780190221911-0054.
Murrieta-Flores, Patricia, Christopher Donaldson, and Ian Gregory. 2016. GIS and Literary History: Advancing Digital Humanities Research Through the Spatial Analysis of Historical Travel Writing and Topographical Literature.” Digital Humanities Quarterly 11 (1). http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/11/1/000283/000283.html.
Muzny, Grace, Mark Algee-Hewitt, and Dan Jurafsky. 2017. “Dialogism in the Novel: A Computational Model of the Dialogic Nature of Narration and Quotations.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqx031.
Nagy, Benjamin. 2021. “Metre as a Stylometric Feature in Latin Hexameter Poetry.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 36 (4): 999–1012. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqaa043.
———. 2023. “Some Stylometric Remarks on Ovid’s Heroides and the Epistula Sapphus.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, January, fqac098. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqac098.
Navarro-Colorado, Borja. 2017. “A Metrical Scansion System for Fixed-Metre Spanish Poetry.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 33 (1): 112–27. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqx009.
Nini, Andrea. 2018. “An Authorship Analysis of the Jack the Ripper Letters.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 33 (3): 621–36. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqx065.
Nockels, Joe, Paul Gooding, Sarah Ames, and Melissa Terras. 2022. “Understanding the Application of Handwritten Text Recognition Technology in Heritage Contexts: A Systematic Review of Transkribus in Published Research.” Archival Science 22 (3): 367–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-022-09397-0.
Noecker Jr, John, and Michael Ryan. 2012. “Distractorless Authorship Verification.” In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’12), 785–89. Istanbul, Turkey: European Language Resources Association (ELRA). http://www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2012/pdf/238_Paper.pdf.
Ochab, Jeremi K., Joanna Byszuk, Steffen Pielström, and Maciej Eder. 2019. “Identifying Similarities in Text Analysis: Hierarchical Clustering (Linkage) Versus Network Clustering (Community Detection).” In Digital Humanities 2019: Book of Abstracts. Utrecht: ADHO. https://doi.org/10.34894/DSVVAC.
Olsen, Mark, Russell Horton, and Glenn Roe. 2011. “Something Borrowed: Sequence Alignment and the Identification of Similar Passages in Large Text Collections.” Digital Studies / Le Champ Numérique. 258-1254-3-PB.
Organisciak, Peter, Sayan Bhattacharyya, Loretta Auvil, J. Stephen Downie, and Beth Plale. 2014. “Large-Scale Text Analysis Through the HathiTrust Research Center.” In Digital Humanities Conference. https://dh-abstracts.library.virginia.edu/works/1979.
Paige, Nicholas D. 2020. Technologies of the Novel: Quantitative Data and the Evolution of Literary Systems. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Paquot, Magali, and Yves Bestgen. 2009. “Distinctive Words in Academic Writing: A Comparison of Three Statistical Tests for Keyword Extraction.” In Corpora: Pragmatics and Discourse, edited by Andreas H. Jucker, Daniel Schreier, and Marianne Hundt. Brill | Rodopi. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789042029101_014.
Partington, Alan. 2009. “Evaluating Evaluation and Some Concluding Thoughts on CADS.” In Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies on the Iraq Conflict, First, 277–320. Routledge.
Pettersson, Eva, Beáta Megyesi, and Jörg Tiedemann. 2013. “An SMT Approach to Automatic Annotation of Historical Text.” In Proceedings from the Workshop on Computational Historical Linguistics at NoDaLiDa 2013. NEALT. https://cl.lingfil.uu.se/~bea/publ//pettersson-megyesi-tiedemann.pdf.
Pianzola, Federico, Alberto Acerbi, and Simone Rebora. 2020. “Cultural Accumulation and Improvement in Online FanFiction.” Computational Humanities Research. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2723/short8.pdf.
Piotrowski, Michael. 2012. Natural Language Processing for Historical Texts. Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-02146-6.
Piper, Andrew. 2017. “Fictionality.” Journal of Cultural Analytics 2 (2). https://doi.org/10.22148/16.011.
Piper, Andrew, and Eva Portelance. 2016. “How Cultural Capital Works: Prizewinning Novels, Bestsellers, and the Time of Reading.” Post45: Peer Reviewed. https://post45.org/2016/05/how-cultural-capital-works-prizewinning-novels-bestsellers-and-the-time-of-reading/.
Plecháč, Petr. 2021. Versification and Authorship Attribution. Charles University in Prague, Karolinum Press.
Porter, J. D. 2018. “Prestige/Popularity.” Pamphlets of the Stanford Literary Lab, no. 17. https://litlab.stanford.edu/LiteraryLabPamphlet17.pdf.
Powell, Daniel James. 2014. “Seeing Dialogue: Network Visualization of Dramatic Texts.” In Digital Humanities Conference 2014: Book of Abstract. Lausanne: ADHO. https://dh-abstracts.library.virginia.edu/works/2055.
Rebora, Simone, J. Berenike Herrmann, Gerhard Lauer, and Massimo Salgaro. 2018a. “Robert Musil, a War Journal, and Stylometry: Tackling the Issue of Short Texts in Authorship Attribution.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 34 (3): 582–605. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqy055.
———. 2018b. “Whose Signal Is It Anyway? A Case Study on Musil for Short Texts in Authorship Attribution.” In Digital Humanities 2018: Book of Abstracts. Mexiko City: ADHO. https://dh-abstracts.library.virginia.edu/works/6307.
Reeve, Jonathan. 2018. “Does Late Style Exist? New Stylometric Approaches to Variation in Single-Author Corpora.” In Digital Humanities Conference 2018 Book of Abstracts. Mexiko City: ADHO. https://dh-abstracts.library.virginia.edu/works/6498.
———. 2020. “Text-Matcher.” GitHub Repository. GitHub. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3937738.
Reinig, Ines, and Ines Rehbein. 2019. “Metaphor Detection for German Poetry.” In Proceedings of the 15th Conference on Natural Language Processing (KONVENS 2019), 12. https://corpora.linguistik.uni-erlangen.de/data/konvens/proceedings/papers/KONVENS2019_paper_37.pdf.
Reppen, Randi. 2022. “Building a Spoken Corpus : What Are the Basics?” In The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, edited by Anne O’Keeffe and Michael McCarthy, Second. Routledge Handbooks in Applied Linguistics. Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY: Routledge.
Reul, Christian, Dennis Christ, Alexander Hartelt, Nico Balbach, Maximilian Wehner, Uwe Springmann, Christoph Wick, Christine Grundig, Andreas Büttner, and Frank Puppe. 2019. OCR4all a (Semi-)Automatic OCR Workflow for Historical Printings.” Applied Sciences 9 (22): 4853. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9224853.
Rißler-Pipka, Nanette. 2016. Der falsche Quijote? Autorschaftsattribution für spanische Prosa der frühen Neuzeit.” In DHd 2016 Modellierung, Vernetzung, Visualisierung, 212–17. Leipzig. http://dhd2016.de/boa.pdf.
Roberts-Smith, Jennifer, Shawn Desouza-Coelho, Teresa M. Dobson, Sandra Gabriele, Omar Rodriguez-Arenas, Stan Ruecker, StéFan Sinclair, et al. 2013. “Visualizing Theatrical Text: From Watching the Script to the Simulated Environment for Theatre (SET).” Digital Humanities Quarterly 7 (3). http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/7/3/000166/000166.html.
Roberts-Smith, Jennifer, Teresa Dobson, Sandra Gabriele, Omar Rodriguez-Arenas, Stan Ruecker, Stéfan Sinclair, Shawn Desouza-Coelho, Alexandra Kovacs, and Daniel So. 2013. “Visualising Theatre Historiography: Judith Thompson’s White Biting Dog (1984 and 2011) in the Simulated Environment for Theatre (SET).” Digital Studies / Le Champ Numérique 3 (2). https://doi.org/10.16995/dscn.240.
Roe, Glenn, Clovis Gladstone, Mark Olsen, and Robert Morrissey. 2016. “Digging into ECCO: Identifying Commonplaces and Other Forms of Text Reuse at Scale.” In Digital Humanities 2016: Book of Abstracts. Krakow. https://hal.science/hal-03211786.
Roelli, Philipp, ed. 2020. Handbook of Stemmatology: History, Methodology, Digital Approaches. De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110684384.
Romanowska, Iza, Colin D. Wren, and Stefani A. Crabtree. 2021. Agent-Based Modeling for Archaeology: Simulating the Complexity of Societies. Santa Fe: Santa Fe Institute Press.
Ruiz Fabo, Pablo, Clara Martínez Cantón, and José Calvo Tello. 2018. DISCO: Diachronic Spanish Sonnet Corpus.” In Digital Humanities Im Deutschsprachigen Raum. http://e-spacio.uned.es/fez/eserv/bibliuned:363-Pruiz2/Ruiz_Fabo_Pablo_DISCO_corpus.pdf.
Rybicki, Jan. 2015. “Vive La Différence : Tracing the (Authorial) Gender Signal by Multivariate Analysis of Word Frequencies.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 31 (4): 746–61. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqv023.
Rybicki, Jan, and Maciej Eder. 2011. “Deeper Delta Across Genres and Languages: Do We Really Need the Most Frequent Words?” Literary and Linguistic Computing 26 (3): 315–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqr031.
Rychlý, Pavel. 2007. “Manatee/Bonito - A Modular Corpus Manager.” In Proceedings of Recent Advances in Slavonic Natural Language Processing. Brno: Masaryk University. https://nlp.fi.muni.cz/raslan/2007/papers/12.pdf.
Sack, Graham Alexander. 2013. “Simulating Plot: Towards a Generative Model of Narrative Structure.” In Digital Humanities Conference. https://dh-abstracts.library.virginia.edu/works/1779.
Sánchez-Martínez, Felipe, Isabel Martínez-Sempere, Xavier Ivars-Ribes, and Rafael C. Carrasco. 2013. “An Open Diachronic Corpus of Historical Spanish: Annotation Criteria and Automatic Modernisation of Spelling.” arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1306.3692.
Savoy, Jacques. 2020a. “Elena Ferrante: A Case Study in Authorship Attribution.” In Machine Learning Methods for Stylometry, 191–210. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53360-1_8.
———. 2020b. Machine Learning Methods for Stylometry: Authorship Attribution and Author Profiling. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53360-1.
Schmidt, Helmut. 1994. “Probabilistic Part-of-Speech Tagging Using Decision Trees.” https://www.cis.uni-muenchen.de/~schmid/tools/TreeTagger/data/tree-tagger1.pdf.
Schneider, Gerold, Eva Pettersson, and Michael Percillier. 2017. “Comparing Rule-based and SMT-based Spelling Normalisation for English Historical Texts.” In Proceedings of the NoDaLiDa 2017 Workshop on Processing Historical Language, 40–46. Gothenburg: Linköping University Electronic Press. https://aclanthology.org/W17-0508.
Schöch, Christof. 2017a. Aufbau von Datensammlungen.” In Digital Humanities: Eine Einführung, edited by Fotis Jannidis, Hubertus Kohle, and Malte Rehbein, 223–32. Stuttgart: Metzler.
———. 2017b. “Topic Modeling Genre: An Exploration of French Classical and Enlightenment Drama.” Digital Humanities Quarterly 11 (2). http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/11/2/000291/000291.html.
———. 2018a. “Théâtre Classique, Paul Fièvre Ed.” RIDE A Review Journal for Digital Editions and Resources, no. 8. https://ride.i-d-e.de/issues/issue-8/theatre-classique/.
———. 2018b. Zeta für die kontrastive Analyse literarischer Texte Theorie, Implementierung, Fallstudie.” In Quantitative Ansätze in den Literatur- und Geisteswissenschaften, edited by Toni Bernhart, Marcus Willand, Sandra Richter, and Andrea Albrecht, 77–94. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110523300-004.
———. 2023. “Repetitive Research: A Conceptual Space and Terminology of Replication, Reproduction, Re-Implementation, Re-Analysis, and Re-Use in Computational Literary Studies.” International Journal of Digital Humanities, March, preprint. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2657846/v1.
Schöch, Christof, Frédéric Döhl, Achim Rettinger, Evelyn Gius, Peer Trilcke, Peter Leinen, Fotis Jannidis, Maria Hinzmann, and Jörg Röpke. 2020. Abgeleitete Textformate: Text und Data Mining mit urheberrechtlich geschützten Textbeständen.” https://doi.org/10.17175/2020_006.
Schöch, Christof, Tomaž Erjavec, Roxana Patraș, and Diana Santos. 2021. “Creating the European Literary Text Collection (ELTeC): Challenges and Perspectives.” Modern Languages Open 1 (25): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3828/mlo.v0i0.364.
Schöch, Christof, Maria Hinzmann, Julia Röttgermann, Katharina Dietz, and Anne Klee. 2022. “Smart Modelling for Literary History.” International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing 16 (1): 78–93. https://doi.org/10.3366/ijhac.2022.0278.
Schöch, Christof, and Allen Riddell. 2014. “Progress Through Regression. Modeling Style Across Genre in French Classical Theater.” In Digital Humanities Conference 2014: Book of Abstract. Lausanne: ADHO. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7785294.
Schöch, Christof, Daniel Schlör, Stefanie Popp, Annelen Brunner, Ulrike Henny, and José Calvo Tello. 2016. “Straight Talk! Automatic Recognition of Direct Speech in Nineteenth-Century French Novels.” In Digital Humanities Conference 2016 (DH2016) Book of Abstracts. Krakow: ADHO. https://dh-abstracts.library.virginia.edu/works/2515.
Schöch, Christof, Daniel Schlör, Albin Zehe, Henning Gebhard, Daniel Becker, and Andreas Hotho. 2018. “Burrows’ Zeta: Exploring and Evaluating Variants and Parameters.” In Digital Humanities 2018: Book of Abstracts. Mexiko City: ADHO. https://dh-abstracts.library.virginia.edu/works/6327.
Schöch, Christof, Karina Van Dalen-Oskam, Maria Antoniak, Fotis Jannidis, and David Mimno. 2020. “Replication and Computational Literary Studies.” In Digital Humanities Conference 2020: Book of Abstracts. Ottawa: ADHO. https://dh2020.adho.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/178_ReplicationandComputationalLiteraryStudies.html.
Schößler, Franziska. 2010. Einführung in die Gender Studies. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Schröter, Julian, Keli Du, Julia Dudar, Cora Rok, and Christof Schöch. 2021. “From Keyness to Distinctiveness Triangulation and Evaluation in Computational Literary Studies.” Journal of Literary Theory 15 (1-2): 81–108. https://doi.org/10.1515/jlt-2021-2011.
Schumacher, Mareike, and Marie Flüh. 2020. m*w Figurengender zwischen Stereotypisierung und literarischen und theoretischen Spielräumen Genderstereotype und -bewertungen in der Literatur des 19 Jahrhunderts.” In Jahrestagung des Verbands Digital Humanities im deutschsprachigen Raum: Book of Abstracts. Paderborn: DHd-Verband. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4621891.
Šeļa, Artjoms, Petr Plecháč, and Alie Lassche. 2022. “Semantics of European Poetry Is Shaped by Conservative Forces: The Relationship Between Poetic Meter and Meaning in Accentual-Syllabic Verse.” PLOS ONE 17 (4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266556.
Šeļa, Artjoms, and Oleg Sobchuk. 2017. “The Shortest Species: How the Length of Russian Poetry Changed (1750).” Studia Metrica Et Poetica 4 (1): 66–84. https://doi.org/10.12697/smp.2017.4.1.03.
Seo, Jangwon, and W. Bruce Croft. 2008. “Local Text Reuse Detection.” In Proceedings of the 31st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 571–78. SIGIR ’08. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/1390334.1390432.
Shang, Wenyi, and Ted Underwood. 2021. “Improving Measures of Text Reuse in English Poetry: 16th International Conference on Diversity, Divergence, Dialogue, iConference 2021.” Edited by Katharina Toeppe, Hui Yan, and Samuel Kai Chu. Diversity, Divergence, Dialogue - 16th International Conference, iConference 2021, Proceedings, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 469–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71292-1_36.
Sharmaa, Aniruddha, Yuerong Hu, Peizhen Wu, Wenyi Shang, Shubhangi Singhal, and Ted Underwood. 2020. “The Rise and Fall of Genre Differentiation inEnglish-Language Fiction.” In Computational Humanities Conference 2020. Amsterdam: CEUR. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2723/long27.pdf.
Shutova, Ekaterina. 2017. “Annotation of Linguistic and Conceptual Metaphor.” In Handbook of Linguistic Annotation, edited by Nancy Ide and James Pustejovsky, 1073–1100. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-0881-2_40.
Simmons, Joseph P., Leif D. Nelson, and Uri Simonsohn. 2011. “False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant.” Psychological Science 22 (11): 1359–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632.
Sirkin, R. Mark. 2006. Statistics for the Social Sciences. Third. SAGE Publications, Inc.
Smaldino, Paul E. 2017. “Models Are Stupid, and We Need More of Them.” In Computational Social Psychology, 311–31. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315173726-14.
Smith, David A., Ryan Cordel, Elizabeth Maddock Dillon, Nick Stramp, and John Wilkerson. 2014. “Detecting and Modeling Local Text Reuse.” In IEEE/ACM Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, 183–92. https://doi.org/10.1109/JCDL.2014.6970166.
So, Richard Jean, Hoyt Long, and Yuancheng Zhu. 2018. “Race, Writing, and Computation: Racial Difference and the US Novel, 1880-2000.” Journal of Cultural Analytics 3 (2). https://doi.org/10.22148/16.031.
Sobchuk, Oleg. 2016. “The Evolution of Dialogues: A Quantitative Study of Russian Novels (1830).” Poetics Today 37 (1): 137–54. https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-3452643.
Spencer, Matthew, Elizabeth A Davidson, Adrian C Barbrook, and Christopher J Howe. 2004. “Phylogenetics of Artificial Manuscripts.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 227 (4): 503–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2003.11.022.
Sperberg-McQueen, Michael, and Lou Burnard. 1994. “Guidelines for Electronic Text Encoding and Interchange.” Oxford: Text Encoding Initiative. https://tei-c.org/guidelines/p5/.
Stamatatos, Efstathios. 2009. “A Survey of Modern Authorship Attribution Methods.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60 (3): 538–56. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21001.
———. 2013. “On the Robustness of Authorship Attribution Based on Character N-Gram Features.” Journal of Law and Policy 21 (2). https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/jlp/vol21/iss2/7.
Stefanowitsch, Anatol. 2020. Corpus Linguistics: A Guide to the Methodology. Vol. 7. Language Science Press. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3735822.
Storey, Grant, and David Mimno. 2020. “Like Two Pis in a Pod: Author Similarity Across Time in the Ancient Greek Corpus.” Journal of Cultural Analytics 5 (2). https://doi.org/10.22148/001c.13680.
Sturgeon, Donald. 2017. “Unsupervised Identification of Text Reuse in Early Chinese Literature.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 33 (3). https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqx024.
Suzuki, Takafumi, Shuntaro Kawamura, Fuyuki Yoshikane, Kyo Kageura, and Akiko Aizawa. 2012. “Co-Occurrence-Based Indicators for Authorship Analysis.” Literary and Linguistic Computing 27 (2): 197–214. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqs011.
Tagliamonte, Sali A. 2011. Variationist Sociolinguistics: Change, Observation, Interpretation. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Talbot, Mary M. 2019. Language and Gender. Third. Cambridge, UK ; Medford, MA: Polity Press.
Tehrani, Jamshid J. 2013. “The Phylogeny of Little Red Riding Hood.” PLOS ONE 8 (11): e78871. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078871.
Tehrani, Jamshid J., Quan Nguyen, and Teemu Roos. 2015. “Oral Fairy Tale or Literary Fake? Investigating the Origins of Little Red Riding Hood Using Phylogenetic Network Analysis.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 31 (3): 611–36. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqv016.
Throne, Jeremy. 2014. “Modeling the Communications Circuit: An Agent-based Approach to Reading in N-Dimensions.” In Complexity and the Human Experience. Jenny Stanford Publishing.
Thuillard, Marc, Julien d’Huy, Yuri Berezkin, and Jean-Loïc Le Quellec. 2018. “A Large-Scale Study of World Myths.” Trames Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences 22 (January): 407–24.
Tollebeek, Jo, Marc Boone, and Karel Van Nieuwenhuyse. 2022. Een canon van Vlaanderen : motieven en bezwaren. Vol. 78. KVAB Press. http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-8766324.
Traub, Myriam, and Jacco van Ossenbruggen. 2015. “Workshop on Tool Criticism in the Digital Humanities.” Amsterdam: CWI. https://ir.cwi.nl/pub/23500.
Trilcke, Peer, Frank Fischer, and Mathias Göbel. 2016. Dramen als small worlds? Netzwerkdaten zur Geschichte und Typologie deutschsprachiger Dramen 1730-1930.” In Jahreskonferenz 2016 des Verbands Digital Humanities im deutschsprachigen Raum. Leipzig: DHd-Verband. https://zenodo.org/record/3526423#.ZCcSynZBy3A.
Trilcke, Peer, Frank Fischer, Mathias Göbel, and Dario Kampkaspar. 2016. “Theatre Plays as ’Small Worlds’? Network Data on the History and Typology of German Drama, 1730.” In Digital Humanities Conference 2016: Book of Abstracts. Krakow: ADHO. https://dh2016.adho.org/abstracts/360.
Trilcke, Peer, Frank Fischer, and Dario Kampkaspar. 2015. “Digital Network Analysis of Dramatic Texts.” In Digital Humanities Conference 2015: Book of Abstracts. Sydney: ADHO. https://dh-abstracts.library.virginia.edu/works/2228.
Tsvetkov, Yulia, Leonid Boytsov, Anatole Gershman, Eric Nyberg, and Chris Dyer. 2014. “Metaphor Detection with Cross-Lingual Model Transfer.” In Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), 248–58. Baltimore, Maryland: ACL. https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/P14-1024.
Tuccinardi, Enrico. 2016. “An Application of a Profile-Based Method for Authorship Verification: Investigating the Authenticity of Pliny the Younger’s Letter to Trajan Concerning the Christians.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 32 (2): 435–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqw001.
Tuzzi, Arjuna, and Michele A. Cortelazzo, eds. 2018. Drawing Elena Ferrante’s Profile: Workshop Proceedings, Padova, 7 September 2017. Padova: Padova UP.
Underwood, Ted. 2014. “The Proportional Sizes of Genres in Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-Century English-Language Books.” In Digital Humanities 2014: Book of Abstracts. Lausanne: ADHO. https://dh-abstracts.library.virginia.edu/works/2109.
———. 2017. “The Life Cycles of Genres.” Journal of Cultural Analytics 2 (2). https://doi.org/10.22148/16.005.
———. 2019a. Distant Horizons: Digital Evidence and Literary Change. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
———. 2019b. “Do We Understand the Outlines of Literary History?” In Distant Horizons. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226612973.003.0001.
Underwood, Ted, David Bamman, and Sabrina Lee. 2018. “The Transformation of Gender in English-Language Fiction.” Journal of Cultural Analytics 3 (2). https://doi.org/10.22148/16.019.
Underwood, Ted, Michael L. Black, Loretta Auvil, and Boris Capitanu. 2013. “Mapping Mutable Genres in Structurally Complex Volumes.” In 2013 IEEE International Conference on Big Data, 95–103. Silicon Valley, CA, USA: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/BigData.2013.6691676.
Underwood, Ted, Kevin Kiley, Wenyi Shang, and Stephen Vaisey. 2022. “Cohort Succession Explains Most Change in Literary Culture.” Sociological Science 9 (May): 184–205. https://doi.org/10.15195/v9.a8.
Underwood, Ted, and Jordan Sellers. 2012. “The Emergence of Literary Diction.” Journal of Digital Humanities 1 (2). https://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/1-2/the-emergence-of-literary-diction-by-ted-underwood-and-jordan-sellers/.
———. 2015. “How Quickly Do Literary Standards Change?” Figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1418394.v1.
———. 2016. “The Longue Durée of Literary Prestige.” Modern Language Quarterly 77 (3): 321–44. https://doi.org/10.1215/00267929-3570634.
Underwood, Ted, and Richard Jean So. 2021. “Can We Map Culture?” Journal of Cultural Analytics 6 (3). https://doi.org/10.22148/001c.24911.
van Cranenburgh, A. W. 2016. “Rich Statistical Parsing and Literary Language.” PhD thesis, Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam. https://hdl.handle.net/11245/1.543163.
van Dalen-Oskam, Karina. 2021. Het Raadsel Literatuur: Is Literaire Kwaliteit Meetbaar? Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Van Dalen-Oskam, Karina. 2023. The Riddle of Literary Quality: A Computational Approach. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. https://eadh.org/projects/riddle-literary-quality.
van Dalen-Oskam, Karina, and Joris van Zundert. 2007. “Delta for Middle Dutch and Copyist Distinction in Walewein.” Literary and Linguistic Computing 22 (3): 345–62. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqm012.
Van Deinsen, Lieke, Anthe Sevenants, and Freek Van de Velde. 2022. De Nederlandstalige Literaire Canon(s) anno 2022. Een enquête naar de literaire klassieken: rapportage (voorpublicatie).” Gent: KANTL. https://ctb.kantl.be/assets/files/pages/files/De_Nederlandstalige_literaire_canon(s)_anno_2022_-_Een_enqu%C3%AAte_naar_de_literaire_klassieken_Rapport_(voorpublicatie).pdf.
Van Rees, C. J. 1983. “How a Literacy Work Becomes a Masterpiece: On the Threefold Selection Practised by Literary Criticism.” Poetics 12 (4-5): 397–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(83)90015-3.
———. 1987. “How Reviewers Reach Consensus on the Value of Literary Works.” Poetics 16 (3-4): 275–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(87)90008-8.
van Rees, Kees, and Jeroen Vermunt. 1996. “Event History Analysis of Authors’ Reputation: Effects of Critics’ Attention on Debutants’ Careers.” Poetics 23 (5): 317–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(96)00002-2.
Van Rossum, Lisanne M., and Artjoms Šeļa. 2022. CLS INFRA D4.1 Skills Gap Analysis.” In. Krakow: CLS INFRA. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.6401858.
van Zundert, Joris J., Raymond A. Mar, Karina van Dalen-Oskam, Emily Temple, Isabel Bowman, Farzaneh Heidari, and Ahn Nguyen. 2020. “Features of Timelessness: Intermediate Report on a Quest for Stylistic Features That Mark Literary Canonicity.” In Digital Humanities 2020 Book of Abstracts. Ottowa, Canada. https://dh-abstracts.library.virginia.edu/works/9675.
van Zundert, Joris J., and Karina van Dalen-Oskam. 2019. Joris en Karina’s Holistisch Letterkundig Onderzoeksbureau.” Tijdschrift voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde (Journal of Dutch Linguistics and Literature) 125 (4): 357–72. https://doi.org/10.5117/TNTL2019.4.006.ZUND.
Vega García-Luengos, Germán. 2021. “Las Comedias de Lope de Vega: Confirmaciones de Autoría y Nuevas Atribuciones Desde La Estilometría (I).” Talía. Revista de Estudios Teatrales 3 (May): 91–108. https://doi.org/10.5209/tret.74625.
Verboord, Marc. 2003. “Classification of Authors by Literary Prestige.” Poetics 31 (3-4): 259–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-422X(03)00037-8.
Vickers, Brian. 2008. “Thomas Kyd, Secret Sharer.” Times Literary Supplement, no. 13.
———. 2011. “Shakespeare and Authorship Studies in the Twenty-First Century.” Shakespeare Quarterly 62 (1): 106–42. https://doi.org/10.1353/shq.2011.0004.
———. 2012. “Identifying Shakespeare’s Additions to The Spanish Tragedy (1602): A New(er) Approach.” Shakespeare 8 (1): 13–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450918.2012.660283.
von Heydebrand, Renate, and Simone Winko. 2008. “13. The Qualities of Literatures: A Concept of Literary Evaluation in Pluralistic Societies.” In Linguistic Approaches to Literature, edited by Willie van Peer, 4:223–39. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.4.16hey.
Wadsworth, Fabian B., Jérémie Vasseur, and David E. Damby. 2016. “Evolution of Vocabulary in the Poetry of Sylvia Plath.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 32 (3). https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqw026.
Wang, Haining, Xin Xie, and Allen Riddell. 2021. “Cross-Register Authorship Attribution Using Vernacular and Classical Chinese Texts.” In DH Benelux Conference. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4886595.
Weerasinghe, Janith, Rhia Singh, and Rachel Greenstadt. 2021. “Feature Vector Difference Based Authorship Verification for Open-World Settings: 2021 Working Notes of CLEF - Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum, CLEF-WN 2021.” CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2936: 2201–7. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2696/paper_125.pdf.
Weidman, Sean G., and James O’Sullivan. 2017. “The Limits of Distinctive Words: Re-evaluating Literature’s Gender Marker Debate.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 33 (2): 374–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqx017.
Wernimont, Jacqueline, and Julia Flanders. 2011. “Possible Worlds: Authorial Markup and Digital Scholarship.” In Digital Humanities 2011: Book of Abstracts. Lincoln: ADHO. https://dh-abstracts.library.virginia.edu/works/1317.
Wilkens, Matthew. 2017. “Genre, Computation, and the Varieties of Twentieth-Century U.S. Fiction.” Cultural Analytics 2 (2). https://doi.org/10.22148/16.009.
Winter, Bodo, and Paul-Christian Bürkner. 2021. “Poisson Regression for Linguists: A Tutorial Introduction to Modelling Count Data with Brms.” Language and Linguistics Compass 15 (11): e12439. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12439.
Wolfe, Joanna. 2002. “Annotation Technologies: A Software and Research Review.” Computers and Composition 19 (4): 471–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S8755-4615(02)00144-5.
Worsham, Joseph, and Jugal Kalita. 2018. “Genre Identification and the Compositional Effect of Genre in Literature.” In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 1963–73. Santa Fe: ACL. https://aclanthology.org/C18-1167.
Youngblood, Mason, Karim Baraghith, and Patrick E. Savage. 2020. “Phylogenetic Reconstruction of the Cultural Evolution of Electronic Music via Dynamic Community Detection (1975-1999).” arXiv:2011.02460 [q-Bio, Stat], November. http://arxiv.org/abs/2011.02460.
Zeldes, Amir, Anke Lüdeling, Julia Ritz, and Christian Chiarcos. 2009. ANNIS: A Search Tool for Multi-Layer Annotated Corpora.” In Corpus Linguistics 2009. Liverpool. https://doi.org/10.18452/13437.